Cognición y metáfora
Solapas principales
| Día (sugerido) | Hora (sugerida) | Cant. estudiantes | Docentes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jueves | 18:30 a 20:00 | 40 |
|
Facilitar al alumno el reconocimiento de los distintos perfiles teórico que caracterizan y agrupan a los principales planteamientos cognitivos de la conducta
Familiarizar al alumno con el planteamiento de la cognición corpórea (con especial hincapié en sus contribuciones a la relación cuerpo-mente, a la conectividad de los módulos del lenguaje con otras áreas, la naturaleza del significado, al fenómeno de la abstracción y al progreso de la Psicolingüística)
Familiarizar al alumno con los planteamientos de la Lingüística cognitiva, particularmente la metáfora cognitiva y su estudio por medios experimentales y psicolingüísticos
Registrar el conjunto de metáforas cognitivas lexicalizadas en el español uruguayo
TEMA 1. Psicología Cognitiva y Ciencias Cognitivas: conceptos, metáforas explicadoras, etapas y perfiles teórico-epistemológicos
Bibliografía por secuencia de abordaje:
- Froese, T. (2016). De la Cibernética a la nueva ciencia cognitiva. Ciencia, 67, 52-58
2. Vásquez, A., Apud, I. & Ruiz, P. (2015). Introducción a la historia y los métodos de la Psicología cognitiva. En A. Vásquez (Ed.), Manual de Introducción a la Psicología Cognitiva, (pp. 28-38). Montevideo: UCUR-UdelaR
3. Gomilla, A. (2007). Los laberintos de la filosofía de la mente: un mapa de situación. En: D. Pérez Chico & M. Barroso (Eds.), Pluralidad de la filosofía analítica, (pp. 189-216). Barcelona: Plaza y Valdés
TEMA 2. La cognición corpórea: supuestos, conceptos e interpretaciones del planteamiento
Bibliografía por secuencia de abordaje:
1. Harnad, S. (1990).The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335-346.
2. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
3. Cruz, J., & Gordon, R. M. (2003). Simulation theory. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science.
4. Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2(12), 493-501
5. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565
TEMA 3. La metáfora cognitiva: concepto y metáforas transculturales (tiempo, emociones, poder, moralidad)
Bibliografía por secuencia de abordaje:
- Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1995). Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Madrid: Rei
2. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1−28
3. Casasanto, D., & Gijssels, T. (2015). What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), 327-337
Artículos para asignación de presentaciones y trabajos (lectura individuales. Hay 48 textos):
A. Generales:
1. Ahrens, K. (2006). Mapping principles for conceptual metaphors. Paper presented at the Sixth Conference on Research and Applying Metaphor. University of Leeds, England. April 10-12
2. Casasanto, D. (2013). Experiential origins of mental metaphors: Language, culture, and the body. The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life, 249-268
3. Coulson, S. & Matlock, T. (2001). Metaphor and the space structuring model. Metaphor & Symbol, 16, 295-316
4. Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Mano, Q. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2011). The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2376-2386
5. Lederer, J. (2015). Assessing Claims of Metaphorical Salience Through Corpus Data. 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2015) (pp. 1255-1259). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
6. Mashal, N., Vishnu, T., & Laor, N. (2014). The role of the precuneus in metaphor comprehension: evidence from an fMRI study in people with schizophrenia and healthy participants. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8
7. Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PloS one, 9(12), e113536
8. Schmidt, G. L., Kranjec, A., Cardillo, E. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2010). Beyond laterality: a critical assessment of research on the neural basis of metaphor. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(01), 1-5
9. Soriano, C., & Manzanares, J. V. (2005). Cognitive Metaphor and Empirical Methods. BELLS: Barcelona english language and literature studies, (14), 2
10. Wilcox, P. (2000). Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press
11. Yap, D., Staum Casasanto, L., & Casasanto, D. (2014). Metaphoric iconicity in signed and spoken languages. En P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1808-1813.) Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Sobre tiempo, causalidad y número:
12. Aguirre, R. & Santiago, J. (2015). Do potential past and future events activate the lateral mentaltimeline? En D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.). Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 48-53). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society
13. Bonato, M., & Umiltà, C. (2014). Heterogeneous timescales are spatially represented. Frontiers in psychology, 5
14. Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speaker’s conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1-22
15. Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition 106 (2), 579-593
16. Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Understanding time as spatial metaphor. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17 (5), 537-565
17. Gijssels, T., Bottini, R., Rueschemeyer, S. A., & Casasanto, D. (2013). Space and time in the parietal cortex: fMRI Evidence for a neural asymmetry. 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013) (pp. 495-500). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
18. Kranjec, A. & McDonough, L. (2011). The implicit and explicit embodiment of time. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 735–748
19. Kranjec, A., Cardillo, E. R., Schmidt, G. L., Lehet, M., & Chatterjee, A. (2012). Deconstructing events: The neural bases for space, time, and causality. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 24(1), 1-16
20. McGlone, M. S. & Harding, J. L. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental. Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1211-1223
21. Miles, L. K., Tan, L., Noble, G. D., Lumsden, J., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Can a mind have two time lines? Exploring space-time mapping in Mandarin and English speakers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Volume 18, 3, 598-604
22. Nuñez, R. E. & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergence evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparision of spatial construal of time. Cogn. Sci.(30),3, 401-50
23. Santiago, J. Lupiañez, J, Pérez, E. & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) files form left to right. Psychon Bull Rev.(14), 512-6
24. Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Funes, M. J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2010b). Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 17–24
25. Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Israeli, Z., y Gabay, S. (2010a). Is the future the right time? Experimental Psychology, 57, 308-314
26. Santiago, J. & Vigglioco, G. (2014). The left-right mental timeline in Sign Language: Language vs. Culture. (Manuscript).
27. Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745-757
28. Teuscher, U., McQuire, M., Collins, J. & Coulson, S. (2008). Congruity Effects in Time and Space: Behavioral and ERP Measures. Cognitive Science, 32, 563-578
29. Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S. & A. Winter. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology 23, 515-557
30. Ulrich, R. & Maienborn, C. (2010). Left–right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 117, 126-138
31. Weger & Pratt, (2008). Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 426-430
C. Sobre emociones:
32. Valenzuela, J., & Soriano, C. (2007). Reading anger stories: A lexical decision task as a test for the existence of metaphorical representation. Language, Mind, and the Lexicon. Hamburg: Peter Lang, 281-303.
33. Reali, F. & Arciniegas, C. (2014). Metaphorical conceptualization of emotion in Spanish: Two studies in the role of framing. Metaphor and the Social World, 5,(1), 20-41
34. Reali F., Soriano, T & Rodríguez D. (2016) How we think about depression: The role of metaphorical framing. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48 (3)
D. Sobre moralidad:
35. Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351-367
TEMA 4. El rol del pensamiento metafórico en el desarrollo, el aprendizaje y el discurso: léxico mental, redes semánticas y proyección semántica
Bibliografía
1. Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time semantics, and the child. En T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
2. Pace, A., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R.M. (En prensa). How high quality language environments create high quality learning environments. En S. Jones & N. Lesaux. The Leading Edge of Early Childhood Education.
3. Piercey, C. D., & Joordens, S. (2000). Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks. Memory & Cognition, 28, 657–666
4. Shen, Y. & Balaban, N. (1999). Metaphor (In)Coherence in Discourse. Discourse Processes, 28 (2), 139-153
5. Shu Ping, G. & Ahrens, K. (2007). Processing Conceptual Metaphors in On Going Discourse. Metaphor & Symbol, 22 (4) 313-330